Really extremely helpful - and your comments are well taken, and not
in the least patronising Fred!  i am certainly the guilty party when
it comes to verbosity and mixing strings! Thanks to you and Eric for
your helpful and quick comebacks.

Eric, is there a way to have the system remember where it has copied
up to already, so you don't have to export data that has already been
exported (prefer not to use a cookie based system, as this has privacy
implications but also practitioners may use different computers).

Dickon

On 2 June, 16:26, FND <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As part of the TiddlyWeb development project [...]
> > any client notes made by a practitioner should not be liable to
> > being edited or deleted after they have first been made
>
> Since you're dealing with TiddlyWeb, you could store such notes as
> tiddlers in a bag with permissions preventing unauthorized editing.
> This might be useful:
>      http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki/t/2625184f2326aad7
>
> > I have previously asked about how we might get a "one button
> > csv file export" organised [...] but I've not had any feedback
>
> Sorry to hear that - feel free to bump that topic as a reminder.
>
> Generally speaking (I don't remember that particular thread), there are
> a variety of reasons which could result in lack of feedback, e.g.
> * bad timing: we might simply have missed your post (e.g. due to stress,
>   holidays etc.) - bumping the thread after a few days usually helps
> * reproducibility: it's important for us to have all the details we need
>   to properly analyze it (cf.http://tiddlywiki.org/wiki/Troubleshooting)
> * unclear expectations: sometimes it's not immediately obvious what the
>   question is (also see below)
> * mixing topics: separate issues should be discussed separate threads -
>   this also helps recognizing which issues are still unsolved
> * excessive verbosity: concise posts often have better chances of
>   getting a response (AKA TLDR... ); while the personal background story
>   might be (and indeed, often is) interesting, it's usually secondary to
>   the actual issue
>
> This kinda looks like a patronizing rant now - it's not meant to be...
>
> -- F.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to