> The second does the same yet there is not 'for' loop. > I won't be able to understand the detail , but why did you change it?
There is a for loop still, using the jQuery.each* utility function. No particular reason, really, other than to conform to the jQuery way. I'm somewhat torn about $.each; it can be useful (or at least convenient), but for most cases it seems like an unnecessary abstraction over regular for loops. -- F. * http://docs.jquery.com/Utilities/jQuery.each --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
