> I had been using an ExpandSliders script that I recently noticed is no > longer in tiddlytools. It looked as though ToggleSliders is what I > should be using instead, so I made the switch,
ExpandSlidersScript was re-written and renamed ToggleSliders, since it: A) actually toggles (expands or *collapses*) multiple sliders with a single click B) has been converted from an 'inline script' into a 'transclusion', written using only 'pure TW' syntax, so there's no dependencies. > In the "Usage" and "Example" that appears (between triple brackets) in > the tiddler ToggleSliders, the macro is: > <<tiddler ToggleSliders with: here "open all" "close all">> > However, in the working example (not between triple brackets), the > macro adds ##show: > <<tiddler ToggleSliders##show with: here "open all" "close all">> When you view a transclusion tiddler directly (as opposed to *using* it by embedding it in another tiddler via <<tiddler TiddlerName with: ... >>) it will display its ##info section (the documentation), rather than the ##show section, so that the tiddler is 'self- documenting'. The *visible* syntax, without "##show", is the correct syntax to use. The additional "##show" section reference is needed in this case only because it is embedded within the ToggleSliders tiddler itself. It ensures that the example embedded direclty in the transclusion's ##info section will invoke the functionality rather than attempting to recursively transclude the documentation into *itself*. > I can only get the macro to work when I include the ##show. Are there > cases where one would be able to use it without ##show? The tiddler works for me (in other tiddlers) without the ##show. For example: http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#QuickStart has a 'show all'/'hide all' command link (look near the upper right of the rendered tiddler content) that toggles all the sliders in QuickStart at one time, using this syntax: <<tiddler ToggleSliders with: 'here' 'show all' 'hide all'>> The conversion from inline script to transclusion should not have changed the way you use this tiddler (except for the name, of course). Can you create a *minimal test case* and then post the document somewhere so I can debug it? -e --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
