TonyM

Further to my last an obvious fact is that outside maths conversion 
"standards" -- where for instance base-12 counts "... A, B, 10 ..."---a lot 
of everyday usage is "dual based". For instance "10, 11, 12" inches. And 12 
inches IS 1 foot.

This actually corresponds to how most people have counted through history 
where "the turn" is dual. And counting is in "cycles" that transfer 
(optionally) to a different base at the "turns". So 3 feet IS 1 yard, but 
remains 36 inches too etc. As such they are both "based" and "un-based". 
And you could say "2 foot & 12 inches" and still be understood that its 1 
yard.

Just observations
TT

On Sunday, 13 October 2019 13:17:52 UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> Ciao TonyM
>
> FYI I'm interested in the confluence of social (including historial) 
> counting and calculation.
>
> I find some of the widespread European decimal based (metric) systems poor 
> compared to the other base systems still widely used in UK & USA for 
> measures. 
> For instance ...
>
>    - inch (12=1) foot (3=1) yard (220=1) furlong
>    - ounces (16=1) pound (14=1) stone
>    - nautical miles / knot
>    - Fahrenheit v Centigrade
>
> Historically there emerged all sorts of mixed-bases for practical 
> calculation, many still in use.
>
> WHY so? is a very interesting question. But comes down to the fact the 
> world is not divided into any particular system, rather the physical 
> attributes of a social context fostered different bases of calculation 
> matched to different ways of "carving it up" conceptually.
>
> Being able to think in different bases is particularly useful. 
> Since programmers can often think in other than base-10 (binary, octal & 
> hexadecimal are obvious cases) it might be interesting for them too to play 
> the social aspect, where "formal" calculation hits social praxis?
>
> A good example is "a baker's dozen" (base-13). Its a case where needed 
> utility built on from (base-12) maths. Another example is how nautical 
> miles are related to longtitude & latitude.
>
> This is somewhat different than looking within math itself as a 
> self-referential world with interesting patterns to find & enjoy for their 
> own sake. Also of great merit.
>
> Just thoughts.
> TT
>
> TonyM wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Join our Collaborative Project -* Numbers*
>>
>> Recent collaborative discussions and illustrated some interesting methods 
>> and challenges for our community. Words and Numbers.
>> I thought I would initiate a couple to stimulate activity from the 
>> community, join in and contribute if you can otherwise lurkers are fine.
>>
>> *AIM: *Develop and improve the ability for people to interrogate large 
>> number lists with TiddlyWiki. Allow each number to be annotated with 
>> relationships to other numbers.
>>
>> *Inspiration: *Whatever your relationship to numbers, every number small 
>> or large has its own qualities, do you have a favorite number?, did you 
>> know the difference between 0 and one is either 1 or infinity?, Do you know 
>> about the beauty in the primes?, and that most of the common numbers 12 in 
>> a dozen, 24 hours a day, sixty seconds/minutes in a minute/hour and 360 
>> degrees are all some of the most divisible numbers?
>>
>>    - Let us stick to the counting numbers - integers to start with.
>>    - Let's have a way to annotate numbers with info we can share, 
>>    manually, programmatically or by import 
>>    - Learn more about numbers
>>    - Build various number related algorithms in Tiddlywiki 
>>       - Identify primes, Squares, special number sequences
>>       - Find what sequences fit within other well known sequences
>>    
>> Large lists present possible performance issues, Numbers can stay in a 
>> single data tiddler, or generated in a list until you make a single tiddler 
>> once you wish to add information to a given number. Canned search strings 
>> that may interest people would also be fun, like reoccuring palindromes..
>>
>> *Where do we start?*
>>
>>    - The best way to build a list of numbers and add annotations to each 
>>    as desired
>>    - How do we best generate them? Look them up?
>>    - How do we annotate numbers (eg if a number has the field prime it 
>>    is a prime number)
>>    - What code would identify and flag which numbers are prime, can it 
>>    restart without returning to 1 if you extend you number set further?
>>    - Provide an easy to use way to list numbers with a shared nature, 
>>    without necessarily re-computing
>>    - How to we share new number annotations and relationships we can add 
>>    to our own list in a non-destructive way
>>
>> Lets get started Numberphiles.
>> *A person who is a lover of numbers.*
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/45dba659-d26c-4078-92e6-ef2427cc5f24%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to