Gloom, furthur to furthur to furthur ... I was, and somewhat remain, skeptical about the value of tagging since its voluntary on first post (i.e. thread creator does not have to add any).
And its not used so well. Its very patchy. Also often its not fully clear on first post exactly the import of the thread. But since others can add tags it might be a way around some of the GG limits. Though that requires understanding of the issue. Also people doing GG only through email can't do it. They would have to visit the web. That said: *post-hoc assignment of tags* looks like it might be a possible useful approach towards a sort of pragmatic *semi-sticky*. ?? Just thoughts TT On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 12:18:06 UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Gloom, furthur to further ... > > I now see its possible to combine tags in a search ... > > E.g. "css" & "question" > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/tag$3Acss$20AND$20tag$3Aquestion$20%7Csort:date > > Search syntax: *tag:css AND tag:question* > > Expanding your idea lets pretend tags exist for ... > > *tag:docs AND tag:sticky* > > That might be precise enough not to get swamped? > > A thought > TT > > On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 11:52:34 UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Gloom, further ... >> >> One thing to note is that secondary posters (like me replying here) can >> ADD tags (I just added the "question" tag) to this thread. >> >> It would be possible for any web user to flag certain threads with a tag >> and provide a click to display only those ... >> >> E.g. for "question" : >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!tags/tiddlywiki/question >> >> Its a bit esoteric. You'd need educate people on usage. But with >> self-discipline (i.e. some thought before doing it so you don't end up with >> too many threads included) might help. >> One would need ask Jeremy to add appropriate tags like "sticky" or "keep" >> or "notable" etc. >> >> A thought >> TT >> >> On Wednesday, 23 October 2019 05:49:34 UTC+2, A Gloom wrote: >>> >>> A sticky post, not stricky posts, bur one sticky post for links to >>> certain, select few threads that shouldn't get lost in backscroll like >>> posts from Luis and Watt about efforts to coordinate Group members. >>> >>> another thng-- a note to posters, that if their post-- especially if its >>> one with a question or pressing problem-- is not respnded to -- to post a >>> dummy response like "still seeking help" to bump there post back into the >>> top of the page so their post doesn't get lost in backscroll and never >>> answered (otherwise that person could drop TW out of frustration), I had a >>> post or two I never got an answer to and the only reason it wasn't an issue >>> for me is my stubbornness to figure it out myself) >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/07a591ca-a423-4fd2-a7c8-787a803e5548%40googlegroups.com.
