Mohammad

One really *positive* point I want to underline is that TW's CSS logic is 
*extremely 
elegant* for the basics. 

That is largely an entailment of the architecture of Tiddlers. 

I'd say that the rigorous nesting of elements below the level of the 
Tiddler content is quite remarkable for its consistency. Its unusual to be 
so consistent on a website.

But its just not so well documented.

My thoughts
TT

On Thursday, 31 October 2019 06:53:07 UTC+1, Mohammad wrote:
>
> The CSS is a forgotten part of Tiddlywiki!
>
> All widgets and many wikitext focus on actions, little efforts have been 
> done on the CSS side!
>
> Why?
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/263f327d-56dc-4ce0-b277-b4ff6ac24901%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to