Mohammad, I think roadmaps can be a valuable approach to development however as indicated in that tiddler there is a reference to the GitHub issues which is more of a dynamic list. I agree setting some priorities would be helpful however to do so would depend either on a select few viewpoints or a need for feedback and voting (not effectively available) thus there is value for it to stay an organic and evolutionary process. If you have a strong opinion on a particular item and can obtain support on a particular issue I am confident you can gain support through the forums and github.
The innovation rate of Tiddlywiki is actually quite fast and the pragmatic use is enhanced by efforts such as your own. Recent items not even in the old roadmap include; - Basic arithmetic and string tests - Local storage still to evolve - Multi-access Bob - Various search and replace tools including your own contributions and the new rename - Various authentication changes for server versions (still to evolve) - Innerwiki (spawn) still to evolve Perhaps raising your/our own roadmaps and sharing these with the community could help the development of informal roadmaps? Regards Tony On Thursday, October 31, 2019 at 5:01:05 PM UTC+11, Mohammad wrote: > > In Tiddlywiki.com there is tiddler on Roadmap > > https://tiddlywiki.com/prerelease/#RoadMap > > > The last time it was edited is 2016. > > > Are there any short term midterm and log term priorities, goals? > > > Where Tiddlywiki is going? > > > --Mohammad > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/dd410ed7-4a1e-49e3-b99f-90307d153dab%40googlegroups.com.
