TT, I would personally encourage the production of tiddlywiki lego kits, a few would be nice for festive sharing, such Kits however tend to have a final result, that is a thing in itself.
The subject of organisational systems for multiple wikis is very big, - perhaps there are as many possible solutions as people who want a solution. - Remember with tiddlywiki we build on something with more part types than lego manufactures and the possibilities with TiddlyWiki run to infinity in number of directions. Don't get me wrong I love Lego, but I think I love tiddlywiki more. - Its a real challenge to add structure to something that in many ways intentionally open structurally. I think the kit model may be not appropriate for *"schemata for organisation of wiki."* because its very conceptual. Though I am all for its development. Some thoughts on this, suggest it needs work to even understand what the type of "creature" we want to develop. Such a solution; - should not be enforced or compromise choice - perhaps involve Guidelines and methods rather than a core change - needs to set a defacto standard if we want a cross community solution - Could have supporting Plugins and Macros (Ideally they are of value in their own right- lego pieces) I feel the tools to achieve an agreed interwiki or wiki interaction standard and written guidelines is the way to go but I am not sure how to achieve such a thing in the TiddlyWiki community given our current communication methods and organisational model (not structured). Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b53cb072-1391-407c-a827-0343efe5406d%40googlegroups.com.
