Mogammad Yes the table is a great example of a kind of bootstrap or self cloning process.
You say > In my opinion Tiddlywiki has amazing feature but most of them are not > documented or under-documented! > > I agree many features are under documented, however one of TiddlyWiki's qualities is it "generalist nature" on top of which much can be built. Quite a few things are documented but how to "make use" of them is under-illustrated. The thing is, with "make use of" instructions it is the person who needs the extended instructions, only if they do not work it out for themself or when they know what they are asking for. A lot of solutions out there document there own features and results rather than documenting the code patterns they used to achieve that result. Wiki text is not as self documenting as I would like. I think editions and some plugins achieve what they set out to do but fail to educate and empower. I know it sounds odd but good design and documentation can sometimes make itself obsolete, because the user learns how to do it them self. I think we need to document methods, techniques, code patterns and relate them to common designer needs. Only where we find a gap, a need for a convoluted solution or "one solutions solves many", should we be changing the standard distribution. I think the issue is about empowerment and the right information in the right place. TiddlyWiki can already meet so many needs, they are just not all able to be visualised or their to their realisation clear. Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c18c423b-4912-4542-a77f-556aa65ef0ce%40googlegroups.com.
