Ciao Eric A few more suggestions.
I'm done with what I can do :-) Hope someone else has a shot! Best wishes Josiah > Eric Shulman asked: >> >> Please review the list and make suggestions for tags that could be >> removed (and why). >> >> Bob >> GitHub >> GoogleGroup >> TWC >> TiddlyMap >> date >> design - NOT SURE. It is certainly functional. But "css" might be better >> at tag level. Design of what: code? presentation? >> docs - This one was added by me at some point. Might be better to *replace >> it with "documentation"*. I think it is USEFUL, to highlight new >> attempts to document TW >> editor >> favicon - I think I added that? Seems okay. Its an aspect of TW that is >> defined, though minor. Keep. >> feature-request >> field >> filters >> font >> import >> language >> macro >> maths >> mobile >> newbie >> nodejs >> offtopic >> package - slightly tricky. But we aren't really doing "packages". So it >> seems redundant. >> plugin >> print >> quirk - likely I created that. I doubt anyone would reference "quirks". >> Delete. >> regex >> search >> server >> snippets >> sort >> svg >> tables >> tags >> tiddlyserver >> tiddlyspot >> tips - this was me. Can go. It was a nice idea at the time. But can be >> done though a title just as well. >> transclusion >> type - this is ambiguous as is. Likely means "content-type"? Not worth >> keeping without demand for it. >> update >> variables >> whitespace - not clear enough. This may be about pragma? But not helpful >> alone. Delete. >> wikitext >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3ae1e9b5-9406-452b-85bd-cd0ba34446dc%40googlegroups.com.
