On Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 7:29:15 PM UTC+1, Mohammad wrote:
...

> Well, this is kind of reverse engineering! 
>

You are absolutely right. ... But TW has an "organically" grown UI, which 
was mainly driven by user demand.  

At the very early (alpha) days TW suffered from so-called "divitis". .. 
That means way too many nested div-elements. ... The whole system was in 
constant flux. 

We reduced most of the redundant stuff, but some "wrappers" have escaped 
and made it to the V 5.1.0. Since 5.1.0 backwards compatibility is one of 
TWs major goals. Which is good, but also causes some headache in 
combination with the existing CSS. 

Some "wrappers" are still there. eg: If a tiddler *designed for the sidebar* 
is *shown in the main story* river, it looks and sometimes behaves 
different. That's the way it is. 

That's why, browser dev-tools are our best friends ;)

BUT all in all, we have a functional, stable and mainly backwards 
compatible UI. That's worth something q:-)

have fun!
mario

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e75f7785-19f0-4ae4-a69c-741d2a502426%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to