Hi Jack Thanks for the feedback. No, you didn't insist, but there were others who recommended it, including Conor from Roam, so collectively the 'suggests' felt like an 'insist'! Thanks for being willing to 'test the waters'!
On Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 8:09:17 AM UTC-6, Jack Baty wrote: > > As one of the people preferring to see the titles, I'm happy to see them > back. (Although I wouldn't say I "insisted" on them :)). Based on how you > seem to be using TiddlyWiki, I can see why you could do without them. For > me they almost always add a useful additional bit of context, so thanks! > > I'm going to be testing the waters with this on (a copy) of my main wiki, > but I feel that bringing context and immediacy to backlinks is one of the > most important features of Roam and bringing that to TiddlyWiki is terrific! > > On Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 8:49:40 AM UTC-5, David Gifford wrote: >> >> Thanks for the feedback Mohammad. >> >> I fixed the link. Google Groups had kept the first link and applied it to >> the second. >> >> I really didn't want titles at all in the transclusion section. They are >> visally distracting, when what you want to see is the content. But several >> people insisted, so I caved, and made a separate file for myself without >> titles. >> >> I deliberately kept the titles non-links for two reasons. 1) the gray box >> is already the link, so a title link is redundant. The idea is to move back >> and forth between the notes. 2) Blue title links would be doubly >> distracting when the focus is supposed to be on the note content. >> >> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f0a77d05-b2dc-4f65-9607-5bb1491bd78b%40googlegroups.com.
