On Thursday, February 27, 2020 at 12:27:36 AM UTC+1, TonyM wrote: Perhaps you are not interested but It would help me (and I believe others > would like it) a lot. >
I wouldn't discuss it, if I wouldn't be interested. I just need to understand it in a broader context. > But the question is why is the addition of such bespoke markup not > possible? > It is possible -- and it should create html markup that is in line with the html spec. The spec is important for eg: accessibility tools like screen readers. So our wikitext should produce output, that doesn't confuse those tools. > , from what I can see programmatically it should be trivial, perhaps even > entries in a data tiddler to define them. > Not really trivial. ... The elements you pointed out, are all part of the list-parser. So they create 2 elements. eg: * test ... creates an <ul> wrapper and <li> elements. ; test ... creates a <dl> wrapper and <dt> elements. So if the leading-dot is added, in a naive way it creates nested paragraphs, which is outside the html specs. I did test it with a <section> <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/section> wrapper and <p> elements which seems to be OK. eg: .test 1 .test 2 will give us <section> <p>test 1</p> <p>test 2</p> </section> There may be other possibilities, to add this behaviour, but I didn't think about that ... yet. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/79180b8c-21f1-467d-b504-7f39c81a7c83%40googlegroups.com.
