Hi Michael This issue has been discussed several times - and I haven't found a convincing solution yet.
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki/browse_thread/thread/18ff186ac7df0c80 http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki/browse_thread/thread/48ceae910e804215/4c612a2797a0f483?lnk=gst&q=daveg&rnum=6#4c612a2797a0f483 http://groups.google.dk/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/4017cc1aac25a5d5/f4060b4cba1af8f3?hl=da&lnk=gst&q=monospace#f4060b4cba1af8f3 I looked at http://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide.html And it seems to me that you can make good use of wikisyntax (bullets and indents etc) for RFCs - so I made a quick workaround - maybe this will work for you: Put: div[tags~="mono"].tiddler .viewer { font-family: 'Courier New', Courier; font-size:16px; line-height:20px; } into your StyleSheet tiddler and tag every RFC tiddler with mono... You can tweak the code in many directions, defining background color, border, change font-size and line-height etc etc.. Regards Måns Mårtensson On 24 Nov., 22:32, grunchy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > For my job I wanted to include Tiddlers with some RFCs. I need only a > few ones and yes, I know this is not micro-content anymore. > Nevertheless, seemed to be the most comfortable way... > > I put the text of those RFCs in {{{ }}} with proper newlines. Already > the second tiddler did not work anymore. You can easily try the same: > use RFC 791 (IP) in one tiddler and RFC 768 (UDP) in a second one and > you will immediately see the problem. > > Is there a known limitation? Or a known bug? > > br > Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
