tirsdag den 10. marts 2020 kl. 12.30.10 UTC+1 skrev Hubert: > > Yes, I understand your objectives, but I cannot answer in code if I don't > have your building blocks. > > Anyway, to answer your question on a high level, if your reveal widget > evaluates to False, then anything it embeds (filters included) is simply > not run, which does save time. > > If it evaluates to True, well, then I guess your best bet would be to run > performance instrumentation to see how it performs, as Mario suggested > above. The same applies to your filter run, as long as you can embed the > functionality of a reveal widget in your filter syntax. By running > performance instrumentation you can test different solutions and boost > processing time by a few hundred ms in the best of cases. > > Apologies if this appears vague, I just don't want to speculate. >
Thank you. I am also trying to understand it on a high level. as you say, when reveal widget evaluates to False it is not run, I think there are more benefit to this, that would get lost in in a filter. thanks for clarifying. does it make sense to have a filter like below? will the* all[tiddlers]* do anything? [all[tiddlers]all[current]tagging[]] vs [all[current]tagging[]] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/82a899e9-38a1-426b-9234-2208991ce7c7%40googlegroups.com.
