Hmm, you need to show your work. [tag[apples]-tag[pie]]
gives the empty set for me, which is what I would expect. The hyphen only works BETWEEN filter runs. Inside of a filter run, I would expect that TW would interpret "-tag" as it's own (non-existent) field with a (non-existent) value of "pie". That would give the empty set. On Friday, March 20, 2020 at 12:58:08 AM UTC-7, blosscat wrote: > > Hmm, an exclamation point (!) doesn't work as a NOT operator for me, but a > hyphen (-) does. > > [tag[apples]-tag[pie]] > > > > On Thursday, March 19, 2020 at 11:26:05 PM UTC-7, Jon wrote: >> >> I think that would be: >> >> [tag[apples]!tag[pie]] >> >> Regards >> Jon >> >> On Friday, 20 March 2020 05:02:45 UTC, blosscat wrote: >>> >>> Thank you, both! In time I'm sure I'll be wishing I could exclude a tag >>> among several. For extra credit, what would the syntax be for *apples* >>> NOT *pie*? >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, March 19, 2020 at 9:16:12 PM UTC-7, Mat wrote: >>>> >>>> Or just "[tag[apples]tag[pie]]" >>>> >>>> <:-) >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/efbe9945-ebb9-469e-9891-1ae20574dc3d%40googlegroups.com.
