On Dec 4, 5:28 pm, Craig in Calgary <[email protected]> wrote: > I have found that the longer I run FF non-stop, the slower it behaves.
I find the same thing, the upgrade to 3.05+ was supposed to stop the memory hogging but it merely slowed it down a bit, it still accumulates memory badly especially with long editing sessions. I run procexp.exe all the time and watch the memory usage climb from 1.3Gb when I first start FF to 2.2Gb in a few hours. Then I save everything in TiddlyWiki kill FF and start again. FF has to many lookaheads trying to outguess what you might do saving things you'll never need, http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx AKA procexp.exe Morris On Dec 4, 5:28 pm, Craig in Calgary <[email protected]> wrote: > I have found that the longer I run FF non-stop, the slower it behaves. > Lately I've been living in the TiddlyWiki space, reviewing adaptations > and plugins, gathering notes for several university projects. I'll > work in FF for 12-15 hours almost non-stop. At some point, I haven't > tried to figure out the catalyst, FF begins to consume 40% or more CPU > cycles. It won't release its stranglehold until I shut it down > completely. Sometimes I have to reboot (Visa Home Edition). > > The size and complexity of your TiddlyWiki will affect the performance > of FF somewhat. As my TiddlyWiki content loads grows, I'm beginning to > considerhttp://jackparke.googlepages.com/jtw.html#ArchivePluginor > something similar to try and reduce the load on FF. > > Good luck. Keep us posted if you learn anything. > > Craig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
