Thanks for the input everyone. I've been playing around further with Bob and unfortunately I managed to get it to delete its own settings file!! So I think I'll pass on that one for now.
I'm thinking about setting up 3 wikis... one for myself, one for the other person, and one for shared bits. Hopefully we could even make do with just 2 wikis if I figure out how to link them together somehow... On Friday, April 17, 2020 at 9:07:25 PM UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > > You can't share tiddlers with standard node.js. > > You *could* share if you had a gentleman's (gentle women's) agreement to > create all your tiddlers with your own initials and to NEVER write over > someone else's tiddlers. This would only work with people working as a true > team, where everyone follows the rules. > > On Friday, April 17, 2020 at 12:18:38 PM UTC-7, Mohammad wrote: >> >> Hi Tiago, >> >> If you want self hosted why not to use Tiddlywiki on Node.js! >> >> Another option is Portable Node.js+Tiddlywiki on a thumb drive! >> See https://github.com/garethflowers/nodejs-portable/releases >> >> Regarding Bob, Jed Carty may have the complete answer. >> >> --Mohammad >> >> >> >> On Friday, April 17, 2020 at 9:57:41 PM UTC+4:30, Tiago Espinha wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I've very recently been introduced to the amazing world of Tiddlywiki. >>> Everything's still very new to me but I'm already blown away by the model. >>> >>> Now, I've come to the conclusion that plain static files aren't going to >>> cut it for my use case. Even using something like Gitlab for saving, if >>> there's two of us editing things we'll inevitably end up overwriting each >>> other's tiddly at some point or another. >>> >>> So I started looking at self-hosted wikis. I'm quite handy with servers, >>> Docker and node, so none of that scares me. >>> >>> I've tried this: https://github.com/djmaze/tiddlywiki-docker >>> >>> But it seems like a smallish one-person project. And it doesn't appear >>> to do anything about overwrites. As far as I can tell, the issue would >>> still exist. >>> >>> Then I found out about Bob. >>> >>> My questions around Bob are: >>> - Is it reliable for long term usage? Or will I be locked in once the >>> developer is tired of working on it? >>> - Is there something better than Bob for this use case? >>> - Bob allows multi users from the perspective that it locks tiddlies >>> while they are being edited, but as far as I can tell, it does not record a >>> username. That's kind of a dealbreaker... maybe? >>> >>> Do people have more mainstream alternatives to Bob? >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/da9ca712-3329-4446-81b6-b31a80de8d70%40googlegroups.com.
