Peter, > In my opinion TW has not gained more traction because of how it is > perceived when someone looks at it, i.e. similar to my initial experience. > That's why, in another thread, I mentioned that there should perhaps be a > "lite" version with some basic built in features and buttons for easy > customisation. Subsequently, when one has got used to it, an upgrade to a > "pro" version should be possible. > > I did not get any reactions to that suggestion so I suppose the TW > community is not interested. >
This "perception" has being discussed many times. I have raised the idea of a "standard edition" but a "Pro version" is not practical in my mind because there are too many possible branches. The established alternative is the publishing of editions, quite a few already exist explore tiddlywiki.com to learn more. Put it this way their could be many professional editions. Given your recent reintroduction, and how this newbee thoughts are in your mind, I would be happy to define a "standard edition" with you, then we can see if we can persuade the community. Even in this thread? But I would also encourage you to consider publishing your own edition(s). Conversations of late have being around plugin libraries which could be another way of sharing a set of customisations rather than an edition. Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/69cc9e50-343a-4c05-8195-265acbbeab7e%40googlegroups.com.
