Hi, I couldn't see it being suggested, but a temporary solution may be to use a another shortform than TW(5); say "Tidwi" as in *Tid*dly*Wi*ki for example; when reaching out; it may be less charged (importnt for the first impression) and we can still link it to all existing ressources by specifying that "TiddlyWiki (short: Tidwi) is blablabla" and so on
Best, Anders mandag 2. mars 2020 14.08.23 UTC+1 skrev bimlas følgende: > > Continuation of the > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/MKVwkEmCimQ thread. > > In a nutshell: TiddlyWiki is gaining popularity because it appears in more > articles and podcasts, but most of the time they smile at its name, so it > doesn't seem to be taken seriously (although at the end of the test they > usually praise the software itself). The name TiddlyWiki may hinder its > distribution, so we should consider renaming it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8f78db9f-60c9-438a-a73e-4f9b1dd54d2e%40googlegroups.com.
