Yes, that worked. I actually enclosed them all in a <div>, but great work-around until someone thinks of something better.
On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 at 11:12:41 AM UTC-4, Saq Imtiaz wrote: > > There might be a better solution, but one option is to bribe the parser > and wrap a <p> around those macro calls. > > <p> > <<macro>> > <<macro>> > </p> > > On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 at 4:55:49 PM UTC+2, David wrote: >> >> I was using this code and it was producing a nice list (<<chk0>> is a >> blank checkbox glyph via font awesome) >> >> <div class="faHang"><<chk0>> Zenith silvertip</div> >> >> I could stack those on top of each other and have a good single-spaced >> list. >> >> I decided to make a macro that made that code more concise. I love that >> about TW. So here's my macro.... >> >> \define faHang( bulletMacro:chk0 content:"test content" )<div class= >> "faHang" ><$macrocall $name="$bulletMacro$" /> $content$</div> >> >> which worked great, except it seems to, in effect, *wrap the output of >> the macro in <P> tags*, which double-spaces my list and is *not >> desirable*. >> >> For completeness, here's how I'm calling the macro... >> >> <<faHang chk0 """[[Timeless Baseplate Solid bar .68]] ($60)""">> >> <<faHang chk0 """Whipped Dog 26mm Silvertip""">> >> >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8aba0691-4f32-4898-b155-5bb45095d3c1%40googlegroups.com.
