Hi I am trying to accomplish the same. anyone can point me to an example please?
On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 7:43:25 PM UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: > > I hack $:/core/ui/EditTemplate/tags and $:/core/macros/tag-picker so that > tags can be broken into functional units. That way I don't have > to deal with all tags at once. Instead I pick from a drop-down to see only > tags that are themes, or that start with "R_", or that are used for > "tools", or various sub-topics. > > This of course won't help if your tags are homogeneous, with nothing to > separate functional groups. > > > > On Monday, February 10, 2020 at 6:59:48 AM UTC-8, HC Haase wrote: >> >> @Ton Gerner >> Thank you. my wish was already there. >> >> >> >> lørdag den 8. februar 2020 kl. 23.50.49 UTC+1 skrev A Gloom: >>> >>> I was going to post a perfoemance tip post about that hidden setting-- >>> once I went over 500 tags I would get a noticeable lag when the dropdown >>> reacted to text typed in for adding a tag-- the hidden setting cured that >>> lag issue for me. >>> >>> That setting perhaps should be unhidden by adding it to Control Panel-- >>> i made a crib/cheat sheet listing the hidden settings listed at tiddlywiki >>> . com >>> >> >> I strongly agree that this should be in the controlpanel. when I think of >> it, why hide any features at all? At the least, the hidden features could >> be put in a "advanced settings" tab or something similar, if we want to >> warn people before messing with them. >> >> >>> Only drawback-- if you have tags whose letter length is under the number >>> you set >>> >>> at setting of 2, for a single letter tag you use letter then blank space >>> at setting of 3, for a single letter tag you use letter then blank >>> space, and a second blank space >>> at setting of 3, for a double letter tag you use letter, second letter, >>> blank space >>> >> >> I find it quite fast and intuitive to just type 3 spaces. If we want to >> make a bit nicer option, we could add a button to expand the list, to the >> drop-down text (dont know the correct word for this) : >> >> So instad of >> "Search text too short" >> It colud be >> "Search text too short (expand list)" >> >> But I still like the first proposition better, as I dont see the point of >> showing more than 10 to 20 hits as more is just noise IMO. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c3cc0c63-a7bb-40e6-85c7-1aecc53dbfe8%40googlegroups.com.
