Ciao Tutti & Thomas

As a long term user of Bricks I want to comment thus ...

CLEAR UPSIDES

1 - It gives insight into TW CSS by providing a way to "chunk" the 
style-sheet semantically that becomes very useful.


2 - It provides a clear, logical, method for completely replacing 
"Vanilla"...... *This is easier in the end *than partial rewrites to take 
visual control of TW.


3 - It is not particularly important it is inspired by the Tachyons 
framework. That is a conceptual aid only.

  

SEMI-DOWNSIDES

 

Documentation of TW dynamic assignment of CSS might need better 
documentation.


OVERALL

Thomas' approach is radical and very useful IF you want to have optimal CSS 
understanding for TW.


Through it you can both Make & Learn. 


Best wishes
TT 

 


On Wednesday, 29 April 2020 21:55:32 UTC+2, Thomas Elmiger wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> A first solution of mine is updated to TW 5.1.22: 
> https://tid.li/tw5/apps/bricks.html – an attempt to help designers as 
> well as amateurs like me to re-style TiddlyWiki based on measures borrowed 
> from Tachyons <https://tachyons.io/> (only the measures, not the classes 
> though). If you are a designer and have a lot of time, take a look ;–)
>
> Besides taking into account a few CSS additions and improvements form TW 
> Vanilla CSS, not much happend. What I remember: 
>
> * Bricks was often called a plugin but it is not a plugin. So I removed 
> the misleading word from all tiddler names and call it an app now. 
> * It is published under /apps now instead of /test, the old address is 
> redirected. It is still an ongoing experiment.
>
> Let me know if you find any bugs and I will try to fix them. 
>
> All the best, 
> Thomas
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5d4a5996-7818-4483-982a-a684b76382ef%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to