With respect using a binary yes no that checkboxes create, on a field called list or tags already offends the naming gods. Reusing what I would call core fields for another purpose seems wrong as well.
With all due respect this is not a bug its a footnote. If you must make use of core fields use them as designed. Not withstanding my above comments I always thought it was sad that the core used such valuable field names such as type and list when they could have had a prefix e.g. tw-list but that's evolutionary design for you, we sometimes take hostages of our own future. Somewhat in jest Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c124dd63-eaa6-46f3-9207-b811f891afd1%40googlegroups.com.
