Mat, that looks awesome! I think if there were an easy keyboard shortcut 
for making a new section that would already provide 95% of what I, at 
least, want out of an outliner. 

To be explicit, I think the benefit of an outliner is that it makes 
applying the tiddler philosophy less effortful: you don't have to think as 
much in the creation phase about when a chunk should be individually 
linkable: every node and branch on the outline is automatically linkable, 
so as you're creating you're automatically putting in breaks every time you 
hit enter to make a new outline node. With vanilla TW you have to either 
write in one tiddler and then break it out into chunks later, or regularly 
manually create new tiddlers, which has a lot of friction attached, or 
simply make long tiddlers and leave them that way, which dilutes the power 
of the tiddler philosophy. Having the interface semi-automatically break 
your work into chunks without much thought on your part makes the tiddler 
philosophy work a lot better. Having a keyboard shortcut on your 
SuperTiddlers would go most of the way towards that, because it would be 
easy to make a new tiddler for every paragraph by default, and perhaps even 
every node on a bulleted list (since your plugin already includes the 
ability to have bulleted lists go across sections). 

On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 9:20:57 AM UTC-4, Mat wrote:
>
> There are a few angles to this topic.
>
> If the aim is to improve the authoring experience you may be interested in 
> my ongoing EditorMagic project. I think the concept of a balloon popup 
> <https://ckeditor.com/docs/ckeditor5/latest/examples/builds/balloon-editor.html>
>  
> editor inspired it. I elaborate on the concept here: Trigger Custom Popus 
> via Custom Strings <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/3784>. 
> While this is not quite the same thing as directly editing the wysiwyg 
> text, it would make for a *much *more efficient editing experience. 
> Possibly, it may also be adapted so that it *is* possible to use it in 
> tiddler view mode: If all elements were "targettable" from view mode, 
> perhaps if they had a div automatically added to them, then maybe this 
> would be possible.
>
> From some fiddling with WordPress years ago I recall -- possibly only in 
> some themes -- a system with *three *"views": One showing the finished 
> static look (what we call "view mode"), one showing the underlying code 
> (perhaps what is the html code) and one "in between layer" that was a kind 
> of a...hmm... "mixed view", for example a table that in the finished look 
> would have no visible borders did have borders here for easy selection (e.g 
> to set visibility),  bold text really was bold (like in finished look), 
> hovering an image showed it's resize-handles etc. A 
> high-but-still-modifiable UI level.
>
> I can see several improvements along the way. For example, for defining a 
> macro we "shouldn't" have to type "\define ... \end". It "should" be one 
> tiddler per macro. Setting the tiddler "sort" (type?) as macro 
> automatically adds the $:/tags/Macro (ideally hidden) and the title of the 
> tiddler is the macro title. There's also automatically a field for the 
> parameter list. 
>
> In fact, I think we are sometimes too exposed to Tiddler Philosophy. This 
> stands in the way when composing larger texts. I would like for "compound 
> tiddlers" where editing a tiddler really enables access to multiple 
> tiddlers. I made this long ago but, like much else, I don't think I ever 
> published it:
>
> http://supertiddlers.tiddlyspot.com/#About%20SuperTiddlers
>
> That site actually has several features but for our discussion, only the 
> "SuperTiddlers" concept is relevant. Be sure to read the About tab and try 
> out the Demos - especially the over-the-top Styles demo - and hover over 
> the text(s) in it. As I outline in the About tab, the point is that 
> tiddlers miss context for longer narratives but with a UI change we could 
> easily solve this. Note that tiddlers do *not *need to use multiple 
> sections like that and everything is still just tiddlers. 
>
> The relevance to Edgaras OP here is that a "SuperTiddler" let's you edit a 
> small portion at a time of what is seen.
>
> <:-)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8ee94722-8d24-4484-b9b0-bd71433c42ff%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to