Disregarding the irony of the very title: In another thread someone requested more attention to TiddlyWiki Classic/TWC/TW2, i.e the predecessor to TW5. To which I replied:
I don't get why NEW attention should be brought to TWC which is, after all, > a system we've advanced from. Sure, it works and it's great, but there has > been no development for it in almost a decade. It seems mostly that people > who use it do so because they didn't muster up the effort to make the > transition. Yes, I know this is not 100% the case because TWC is more > performant in some aspects but the same can probably be said of Windows 95 > or whatever. We've moved on, for good reasons, and we should not "trick" > people into spending time on that old technology. There is recurring > confusion for newcomers where they found some plugin or information that > strangely "doesn't work". > Let TWC fade out to be a nostalgic memory that is still *beautiful *but > that we shouldn't *dwell *on. And to which TiddlyTweeter replied: Could you please take this OUT of [that thread] so I can lambast your ass > appropriately. AHA! Challenge accepted! <https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2013/11/WS5/lead_large.jpg> <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a52c770b-2ec7-461d-8eab-a45708acde5d%40googlegroups.com.
