It honestly depends on the what the library does, and your experience with tiddlywiki and javascript. I was fairly new to javascript, especially on node.js, but had background in other scripting and C#.net.
The tiddlywiki architecture, i.e. the raw text -> parse tree -> widget tree -> final DOM, process is very different than other html/js abstraction layers like React, etc. Those work directly on the DOM, but tiddlywiki destroys and re-creates the DOM "at-will" when the underlying tiddler data has changed. This can be a hurdle at first. If you are just manipulating underlying tiddler data, or creating your own $widget, there are some good examples in the $/:core that you can extend. Best, Joshua Fontany On Monday, May 25, 2020 at 9:35:45 PM UTC-7, Tony K wrote: > > I have seen quite a few "porting" / conversion for different JS libraries > into TW. > > would that be hard to do?, I'd like to do it for pixi.js but I am not sure > where to start > > thanks > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f862beee-a23f-4420-8425-78591356730d%40googlegroups.com.
