That's funny. I installed Opera because I thought it ran faster than FF. But now I'm back to FF usually.
Just to clarify, are you using any enhancements for HTML? Like the HTML formatting plugin? On Jan 3, 6:34 pm, DGM <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been writing a TiddlyWiki with some HTML Tiddlers (i.e., enclosed > in <html> ... </html> rather than using Wiki tags) and I've notice > that the rendering perfromance is much worse in Opera than in other > browsers, especially as the size of the Tiddler increases. > > I've quantified the problem with the following test using the latest > versions of Opera, Firefox, Safari, Chrome and IE running under > Windows XP SP2. > > 1. Two pages of random alphabetic text enclosed in <html> ... </ > html>: ~10 seconds to display in Opera. > 2. Four pages of random alphabetic text enclosed in <html> ... </ > html>: ~40 seconds to display in Opera. > 3. Eight pages of random alphabetic text enclosed in <html> ... </ > html>: ~150 seconds to display in Opera. > > There is something exponential going on here! All the other browsers > complete each test in ~1 second, as does Opera if the <html> ... </ > html> tags are removed. > > Does anybody know what is going on here? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
