I had the same concern. What I did is create thousands of tiddlers (you can 
do this programatically), and then do performance tests. It's very 
impressive how TW can deal with huge amounts of content. I even added an 
entire 400-page book in 1 tiddler. It takes a bit longer to open than other 
tiddlers, of course (2-3 seconds). But still totally acceptable.

Of course, you can have more than one TW as well. For example, maybe you 
have your personal TW, but then a TW just for a specific large project.

On Monday, June 15, 2020 at 10:14:56 AM UTC+1, Jake wrote:
>
> It's just I'm editing it for less than a month ang got from initial 2.2mb 
> to 3mb. I'm keeping all the images in separate folders and don't import 
> them in wiki to keep the size to the minimun. Of course I'm far from having 
> size limitations so far, but would Tiddly Desktop for example handle wiki 
> file properly if it reaches 150-200mb size? Just wondering for the future 
> to figure out how soon I would better start splitting it into smaller 
> separate themed wikis.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/79c27cf7-9632-49fa-bbf2-708888e45553o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to