I just realised I should NOT have posted that. This thread is losing the plot on the OP!
OGNSYA has interest in usage patterns. My query now:* How Relevant Is Beaker Browser to TW Uptake?* It seems not relevant to me. Best, TT On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 17:20:51 UTC+2, TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > As far as I understand BB the main problem with it is it uses a protocol > no one uses? > > Its very good. Very tight. Very secure. But how do you leverage it to get > read universally? > > TT > > On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 15:12:22 UTC+2, PMario wrote: >> >> >> On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 3:02:30 PM UTC+2, Birthe C wrote: >> >> Pmario, >>> HYPER-protocol (former DAT-protocol), sure we should use Beaker browser. >>> but how? >>> >> >> I'm on it. .. I'm not 100% sure yet. The 1.0 workflow will change quite a >> bit as mentioned in an other thread. >> >> -mario >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/571ff161-5abe-4787-a5ba-04fd89e2fde1o%40googlegroups.com.
