TT, Thanks for reporting the bug, I have fixed it and riposted, as I expect you can see.
> > IMO this needs to be DEMO WIKI with docs, not a download. > > Its hard to understand the aim otherwise. > > This suggests to me the idea is a viable method. Because you are asking it to be hosted and demoed online. It was a simple and recent discovery I wanted to share and discuss. I attached the examples to help in the discussion. There is no site to demo, only some examples of a method here. In future I hope to use the new share tiddlers plugin and open it in a version of my playground wiki. Until I get a time efficient method for demos I find it a chore that I cant afford to use time for. I am working on Automation to build demo/distribution wikis, however to do this well I need an idea of what is standard and acceptable practice. I was criticised (constructively) in the past, when I included some differences from empty.html in a demo wiki. Any published solution/demo/repository should in my view include a repository of autonomous fields to drag and drop to a wiki, Eventually taking the most popular and placing them in a library. I really want people to be able to make use of fields a lot more, especially new users. As Diego pointed out there are a number of well known needs such as touch date. If we can provide a number of autonomous fields it will encourage a defacto field naming standard as well. What do you think? Regards Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7a7bbe6c-fcca-4a09-8e51-42ffc5302e4fo%40googlegroups.com.
