I *think* I get it. I'll try & see. TT
On Thursday, 25 June 2020 22:04:01 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: > > What you're not showing, which I think must be the missing step, is how > you call "dostuff". If you call it like > > <<dostuff "hammer">> > > it should use "hammer", just like "thing" did. So not sure what the > problem is, unless you're calling dostuff in relation to "thing", somehow. > > On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 12:46:46 PM UTC-7, TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> I try to be brief ... >> >> \define thing(thingie:"wotnot") >> >> User enters ... >> >> <<thing "hammer">> >> >> I have a second macro ... >> >> \define dostuff(thingie:"wotnot") >> >> How do I get "dostuff" to know the parameter *value* is now "*hammer*", >> not "wotnot"? >> >> This is probably awfully unclear! >> >> Trying to grasp basics. >> TT >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/07c62390-aa03-4198-abe2-18b6b3e7e7b0o%40googlegroups.com.
