> > If you by "current apps" refer to applications built in TW then isn't a > plain and empty TW the prime example? It would be super cool if people > could go into the app stores and install a TW via there. (It should > probably not be a totally empty TW - the GettingStarted tiddler should > perhaps include links to tiddlywiki.com and this discussion forum etc, > but that's a detail.)
If I understand that currently, wouldn't it be the same as going into Tiddloid and clicking on new Tiddly? (But simpler - yes) Will such an effort help? Adithya On Thursday, July 2, 2020 at 10:27:46 PM UTC+5:30, Mat wrote: > > Adithya B M wrote: >> >> A challenge would be to be able to have such apps recognised by the app >>> stores as an app in its own right. >> >> This is not a problem. >> > > If there was a TW plugin or similar that could remake a TW to become an > app for the app stores... so people who create various application specific > TWs could very easily publish them there... well that would definitely open > up a totally new world for the TW project. > > >> To help me understand this problem better, can you point me to any >> current apps which can benefit from building this native ui around? >> > > If you by "current apps" refer to applications built in TW then isn't a > plain and empty TW the prime example? It would be super cool if people > could go into the app stores and install a TW via there. (It should > probably not be a totally empty TW - the GettingStarted tiddler should > perhaps include links to tiddlywiki.com and this discussion forum etc, > but that's a detail.) > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/198623c4-f350-4e06-b871-0c986acd2641o%40googlegroups.com.
