Yes, I don't see it as being too practical either, especially because it takes about 5 minutes to set up each file you want to run.
It does suggest something that would be useful (well, maybe) -- node.js for single TW files. So you'd run like: tiddlywiki-s myfile.html -p 8090 -f mydir and immediately (no delay) it would run on port 8090 and use directory ./mydir to serve up any supporting static files. Something that works like tiddlyserver, but without the complicated setup. But I suppose having 20+ methods of saving is probably enough ;-) On Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 8:02:15 PM UTC-7, Birthe C wrote: > > Thank you Mark S, > > Now I got to try it. every time I have read about twexe, I have thought > about it. > From description it is tempting, but in reality I do not find it > practical. I wouldn't run several wikies using it. One special wiki maybe. > > Thanks to you I have now peace in my mind concerning this. (idea for > tiddlywiki can really haunt us). > > > Birthe > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c0736ac7-0d66-4522-97d5-80b6df76f779o%40googlegroups.com.
