Or
[{{!name}is[blank]then{!!title}]]
which reads slightly better, imo.
Thanks for the discussion - I was next wanting to know how to show some
info in a macro only if a field exists and is not blank. I think this will
be useful.
On Saturday, August 15, 2020 at 2:56:42 PM UTC-4 Mark S. wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, August 15, 2020 at 11:49:27 AM UTC-7, Eric Shulman wrote:
>>
>> On Saturday, August 15, 2020 at 11:42:38 AM UTC-7, Mark S. wrote:
>>>
>>> On Saturday, August 15, 2020 at 11:36:52 AM UTC-7, Eric Shulman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The "else" filter only works if the preceding filter produces NO
>>>> result... but if the {!!name} field exists, it has a value... it's just
>>>> blank text.
>>>>
>>>> But that's not the puzzling situation. If *name* doesn't exist, then
>>> there is NO output. I hadn't even checked the case where *name* exists
>>> but is empty.
>>>
>>
>> My *guess* is that {!!name} actually produces a blank value even if the
>> field doesn't exist.
>>
>>
> So, we can do :
>
> [{!!name}!is[blank]else{!!title}]
>
>
> This seems to work whether name exists or is merely empty.
>
> Thanks!
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/407d19a9-1528-48dd-a4cb-88f252f8cbcfn%40googlegroups.com.
