Mark,

The links in my original post and in si's reply work, but in the quoted 
portion of your message, the %20's are replaced with +'s. I'm guessing 
there's a bug either in the new Google Groups or in your mail client (not 
sure how you're reading). If you can't figure out what's going on, try just 
replacing + with %20 in the address bar once you click the link.

On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 12:28:47 PM UTC-5 Mark S. wrote:

> There doesn't seem to be any content at either of these two links. 
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Sunday, August 2, 2020 at 9:29:34 AM UTC-7, Soren Bjornstad wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In the follow-up around the web to the release of TiddlyRemember 
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/tiddlywiki/TiddlyRemember%7Csort:date/tiddlywiki/UD6VyV_r-94/GUnAemoBAgAJ>,
>>  
>> some people took issue with the approach of putting questions in macro 
>> calls, wishing instead questions could be placed in individual tiddlers. 
>> Well, it turns out this was actually possible the whole time and neither I 
>> nor anyone asking ever thought of it! All you have to do is create a sort 
>> of "aggregation" tiddler with a list snippet like this:
>>
>> <$list filter="[tag[TiddlyRememberNote]]">
>>   <$macrocall $name=rememberq id={{!!created}} question={{!!question}} 
>> answer={{!!answer}}/>
>> </$list>
>>
>> Then you just create tiddlers with question and answer fields tagged with 
>> *TiddlyRememberNote*, and all the questions will show up in this 
>> tiddler. Make sure that the filter pulling the tiddlers that should be 
>> searched to retrieve notes matches this tiddler, and you're set. Of course, 
>> this is just one example – any data you can retrieve with filters can be 
>> used to generate TiddlyRemember notes in the same fashion.
>>
>> There's one issue with the version above: the reference on each Anki note 
>> would just point back to the aggregation tiddler, which isn't very useful. 
>> TiddlyRemember 1.1.0 (released today) now supports an optional fourth
>> * reference* parameter to the macro, which causes the reference to point 
>> back to a specified tiddler instead of the tiddler the macro call is found 
>> in. In the example above, we could say *reference={{!!title}}* and the 
>> references would then point back to the actual question tiddler instead.
>>
>> This can also be used to fix a problem that occasionally arose in the 
>> previous version, where if you needed to transclude a tiddler containing 
>> TiddlyRemember questions into another tiddler, the source would randomly 
>> oscillate between the two since either one looked like it contained the 
>> question!\
>>
>> For more, see Dynamically generating TiddlyRemember notes 
>> <https://sobjornstad.github.io/TiddlyRemember/#Dynamically+generating+TiddlyRemember+notes>
>>  and 
>> Soft and hard references 
>> <https://sobjornstad.github.io/TiddlyRemember/#Soft+and+hard+references>.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a81c9c3f-ea5e-4f78-9ba1-e30d633098bdn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to