@Sean this is a bug introduced in TW 5.1.22 Some details here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/tiddlywiki/ENyfB5ZxPWs/eXcv-96NAgAJ
https://groups.google.com/forum/?oldui=1#!searchin/tiddlywiki/$24$3A$2FStoryList$20syncfilter|sort:date/tiddlywiki/22z0Qse3amw/M_0pXIFaAQAJ The easiest solution for now would be to run 5.1.21 On Sunday, September 27, 2020 at 1:03:54 AM UTC+2, Sean Hankins wrote: > > Hi! I'm having an interesting problem with my TW5 installation having to > do with the use of multiple anonymous users and a single editing user. > Whether logged in or using anonymously, when a user opens a Tiddly on their > local web browser, it opens the same one in all other users' instances as > well. This also happens when logged in as an editing user and editing; an > anonymous user (read-only) will get an editable Tiddly opened in their > browser, although any changes aren't saved permanently. > > I have TW5 on my little Linux server that I'm hosting some other node > services on. It's configured to run on port 8080, whereas my other services > occupy port 80. I've poked the appropriate port holes through my router and > I can access the TW5 from anywhere with my IP (e.g., > http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080). While testing I was on a computer on a home > network 10 miles from the server. I've tested multiple computers on the > same internal network accessing my remote TW5 server, all experience cross > client requests. I also tested using my phone on the data network (not on > the same IP or home network, WiFi off). Opening a Tiddly (or more) on the > phone will also open on other computers. > > The installation is vanilla with just the following start up parameters: > >> tiddlywiki World --listen port=8080 host=10.0.0.2 > credentials=worldUsers.csv anon-username="Adventurer" "readers=(anon)" > writers=admin > The creds file (worldUsers.csv): > >>username,password > >>admin,pswrd > > > This issue baffled someone in the TW5 unofficial Discord, and they > suggested I come here, but I still don't know if this is a configuration > issue, installation issue, bug or working as designed. My idea is to have > multiple people use it in a read-only fashion and have only one editing > user, but if it's going disrupt one user having another user browse, maybe > it's just not the right tool, which is too bad, because I love this tool. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/71aa8bc1-4335-4998-98eb-ebec9cf2e9fbo%40googlegroups.com.
