SOLUTION/WORKAROUND
WARNING: this requires changing a core tiddler. The code is there for a
reason. My use case is very specific in that I will only be doing this on
a wiki that runs just to render static tiddlers.
I noticed that the rendering process for the <script> tag renders as
<safe-script>. So I just searched and found the tiddler responsible for
the modification and commented out the code.
The tiddler is $:/core/modules/widgets/element.js and the code to comment
out is
if($tw.config.htmlUnsafeElements.indexOf(tag) !== -1)
{ tag = "safe-" + tag;
}
<https://tiddlywiki.com/#>Again this would I imagine create a very serious
security risk in wikis open to the internet.
On Thursday, October 1, 2020 at 8:42:56 AM UTC-4 Donald Coates wrote:
> Thanks Tones I have been thinking of a way to incorporate this
> transclusion with templates along the lines of the example given where a
> line of text is run through at template:
> `{{Transclusion||$:/core/ui/TagTemplate}}` . I have found a work around
> but I would rather use something like this which doesn't necessarily effect
> the entire tiddler.
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 8:10:15 PM UTC-4 TW Tones wrote:
>
>> Donald,
>>
>> If you look inside $:/core/templates/static.template.html you can see how
>> the template currently does it in two ways in fact for styles;
>> <div id="styleArea">
>> {{$:/boot/boot.css||$:/core/templates/css-tiddler}}
>> </div>
>> <style type="text/css">
>> {{$:/core/ui/PageStylesheet||$:/core/templates/wikified-tiddler}}
>> </style>
>>
>> Notice how its setting $:/boot/boot.css and $:/core/ui/PageStylesheet as
>> the current tiddler and transclude a template?
>>
>> In fact if you look inside $:/core/templates/css-tiddler you will see the
>> style tags in there, of note is this tiddler is unusually formatted
>>
>> There should be a simple way to do this. If the style or script tags are
>> specific to a particular page ie tiddler we could make use of a field in
>> the tiddler to contain a transclusion of the style / scripts that the
>> template subsequently includes in the template, you can then choose which
>> page has which scripts.
>>
>> I do not have the time right now, but such a solution would possibly be
>> reusable and helpful to others.
>>
>> Regards
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 1 October 2020 01:29:29 UTC+10, Donald Coates wrote:
>>>
>>> It is possible to have a tiddler with a <script> block as its contents
>>> and transclude this into the templates/static.tiddler.html so that for
>>> example I have code necessary for the comments section on each page
>>> rendered by that template.
>>>
>>> However I cannot have an <script> block within a tiddler that is to be
>>> rendered through that template, for example the one time, in document code
>>> necessary to embed a github gist that shows a block of code I am talking
>>> about, because it gets mangled into an unusable form in the process of
>>> being rendered. It seems like no matter how I try and put that <script>
>>> code into the tiddler, be it by macro or transclusion, it still gets
>>> 'neutered' in the rendering process. This is what I would like to change.
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 12:20:38 AM UTC-4 TW Tones wrote:
>>>
>>>> Donald,
>>>>
>>>> I personally see no reason why not. TiddlyWiki itself uses raw system
>>>> tags
>>>> <https://tiddlywiki.com/#SystemTag%3A%20%24%3A%2Ftags%2FRawStaticContent>
>>>> for
>>>> a similar purpose. Includes insertion head/body etc... Which you could
>>>> clone for scrips and styles.
>>>>
>>>> You will need to modify the static tiddler template to accommodate it,
>>>> and you can transclude this content from another tiddler.
>>>>
>>>> However a longer lasting and sharable solution would be to provide a
>>>> mechaisium within the static template, to accept this (and other values)
>>>> from the source tiddler
>>>> eg a static-script field in source tiddlers could contain what is to be
>>>> added between the script tags or a transclusion of a tiddler) thus the
>>>> author can decide on a per-tiddler basis which static pages get custom
>>>> scripts or styles.
>>>>
>>>> This would further support the use of Tiddlywiki as a site generator.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> TW Tones.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 11:32:28 UTC+10, Donald Coates wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to have <script> tags and allow them to be rendered in
>>>>> a static page? I understand the security issues for inside a tiddler,
>>>>> but
>>>>> when rendered as an html page it would be useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f15482e3-10a5-4cca-972f-f8211c9b342fn%40googlegroups.com.
