David,

I agree, In fact Mario's answer is in fact the same thing wrapped inside 
some custom wiki text. 

You can see it follows a similar structure which is easier to write, rather 
than "compressed" using the | symbols.

Regards
Tony

On Friday, 30 October 2020 10:09:38 UTC+11, David Gifford wrote:
>
> Thanks Tones. Yeah, I like HTML tables versatility (individually colored 
> cells!) but Mario's approach looks cleaner.
>
> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 4:38:04 PM UTC-6 TW Tones wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> I know where Mario is coming from with his suggestion, and its closer 
>> than you think,
>>
>> However personally I have extended my skills into html tables and are 
>> very happy there. No microscope needed, and when I get to make use of the 
>> technology Mario is discussing that will as easy as well, even identical if 
>> desired. 
>>
>> Using html tables allows you to introduce any feature also available in 
>> HTML tables from paging, to overflow, reordering etc.. 
>>
>> Mohammads +, table tools would only need a little tweak to get what you 
>> want.
>>
>> Tones
>>
>>
>> On Friday, 30 October 2020 06:51:27 UTC+11, David Gifford wrote:
>>>
>>> I remember this kind of table code being discussed once in a Google 
>>> Hangout years ago, then it was never mentioned again there or here.
>>>
>>> Yes, that would definitely solve the problem!
>>>
>>> One question: would » in the cell text break the table? Just wondering 
>>> since  «  and  »  is what Spanish uses for quoted text. They don't 
>>> normally use our English " and ".
>>>
>>> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 1:38:16 PM UTC-6 PMario wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> It would need better CSS, but I think you get the idea.
>>>> -mario
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/317e1d7d-ebc2-4b72-b144-ac059111ddbco%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to