bimlas wrote: Can similar rules be drawn on thoughts as well, e.g. mathematical formulas, > or program design patterns. Is it possible to standardize the way of > thinking even with formulas? Is it possible to refactor thoughts? Can they > be grouped (as integers, irrational numbers, etc.)?
YES. WITHIN *domains of endeavour *there are modes of application; rules. The yearning for standards works. We have many of them. The ISO does them well. The reaching for them aids us. Maths is particularly interesting as a "closed" system. Its edges are fascinating. But, in broader terms, "is there a generic syntax for human meaning?" No. TT, x -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/33270123-3da3-4e5c-b8a4-aa2b52966335o%40googlegroups.com.
