On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 at 6:53:17 PM UTC-7, Jean-Pierre Rivière wrote: > > Other than a question of taste, or of giving a meaningful name to a > complex filter preceding the get operator in my example, it seems that > subfilter has no other intterest, isn't it?
As I already noted in a previous reply (https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/2P6G5NtUuWA/A3Be4gWcBgAJ) ... if you wanted to have different filters based on a field value, you > could write: > <$set name="F" filter="[{!!setting}match[somevalue]]" value="[somefilter]" > emptyValue="[someotherfilter]"> > <$list filter="[subfilter<F>]"/> > </$set> > Note in the above example, I've used the "conditional variable assignment" > form of $set (see https://tiddlywiki.com/#SetWidget) -e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/046dfa23-fd12-4ea8-8ffd-5d347a2e01deo%40googlegroups.com.
