Keelan Cook wrote: > > > I believe your notes are more future-proof in a TiddlyWiki than they are > in most other note-taking tools. It's been mentioned in other comments so > far, but an HTML file is essentially a text file than can be human readable > even if the unthinkable happened and there was a wholesale shift away from > browsers reading HTML to render websites. Futhermore, it really seems > unthinkable for HTML and browsers that read it to go away. From my limited > understanding they appear to be the backbone of the (frontend of the) > internet. I use a Chromebook personally and more and more it seems > computers are really just gateways to connect us to the internet to do > everything. So, I think we're safe with HTML documents for a very long time.
This is a VERY important issue if you are concerned LONG TERM. The history of tech on-net is *littered with casualties.* TW is a very good BEST BET where you need TEXT (HTML), BEAUTY (CSS) and INTELLIGENCE (JavaScript) forever. All three standards are here to stay and are backwards compatible. I've tested with age-old TW they work. To give an example: On a 2014 Android phone the BROWSER is totally kaput, but the TW from then is absolutely FINE. Best wishes TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e9d17124-4418-4a1f-9718-b8bca0cd301bo%40googlegroups.com.
