That will be really excellent.

Thank you so much!

Cade

On Thursday, November 12, 2020 at 11:28:50 AM UTC-6 PMario wrote:

> Hi, 
> This will be implemented in TW 5.1.23 ... the next version
> -m
>
> On Thursday, November 12, 2020 at 6:09:25 PM UTC+1 Cade Roux wrote:
>
>> In HTML <input> there is a disabled attribute.  But this is not available 
>> in <$checkbox>  Would also like to be able to disable <$edit-text> as well.
>>
>> Particular use case is that during my build cycle I am generating results 
>> into some TW in a "read-only" mode where the users cannot sign off on 
>> things and into some TW in a "test verification" mode where users do have 
>> to sign off on things, and I would like the layout to look similar to users 
>> and be able to simplify the code which generates the tiddlers/transcludes.  
>> Currently, I replace those inputs with literal text, but would prefer to 
>> just be able to tag them with disabled so that all the existing TW bindings 
>> logic to tiddlers/fields would work.
>>
>> I am considering just generating <input> elements which would look 
>> similar to the TW <$checkbox> elements but are disabled by attribute (and 
>> would lose their binding to the underlying tiddlers/fields, so that would 
>> have to be a literal as well).  Another option I am considering is layering 
>> a div over them so they cannot get the focus.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Cade
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a8ad22ca-b6c6-4a5b-aacc-e7520656197bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to