I always feel that there's not quite a critical mass of public-facing, content-containing TiddlyWikis out there, and maybe there need to be some more really specific editions so that people don't have to learn to use filters and templates to have a shiny TW that helps them collect and review/present information.
There are more and more, though. The snowball may be building. I found TiddlyWiki by Googling notetaking/information management software in 2005 while writing a thesis. I suspect TW hooks a lot of a certain personality type in this way, but it's not grabbing the low-friction crowd quite as much. On Monday, November 16, 2020 at 4:34:14 PM UTC-5 Ste wrote: > Does the Google Analytics plugin not open tiddlywiki a to Google without > going static? > When enabled Analytics can tell me what tiddlers people have been to. > Genuine question. I really don't know enough about these things. > > On Monday, 16 November 2020 at 20:50:18 UTC TW Tones wrote: > >> Good Questions Mohammad >> >> TiddlyWiki.com does have static tiddlers already, hence why it can come >> up in search engines however the links remain in the static environment >> rather than opening the full wiki. Any one trying to reach out publicly >> that has an internet hosted tiddlywiki should have the additional static >> tiddlers which link back to the full wiki, and a splash screen when loading >> the full wiki. We do not have a template for this or easy community >> solutions to do this, they could be developed with haste. >> >> Generate static html websites that generate a zip file you can save to >> the server host location, perhaps with appropriate search index file etc, >> then decompress and its done, we then need a way to generate new zip file >> with changes only since the last export date to post updated static pages >> only. >> >> Regardsa >> Tones >> >> >> >> On Monday, 16 November 2020 at 23:52:50 UTC+11 PMario wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, November 15, 2020 at 3:48:56 PM UTC+1 Mohammad wrote: >>> ... >>> >>>> 1. Does GitHub repo need better keywords, description? >>>> >>> >>> may be >>> >>> 2. Is it required to have a demo website introducing Tiddlywiki in a >>>> better way? >>>> >>> >>> I think we should have more regular presence on youtube, and may be >>> different users should create their own "static site" blogs. >>> >>> >>>> 3. Is it required to use static website to be indexed by search engines? >>>> >>> >>> IMO this would be an advantage. I think goolge would prefer static sites. >>> >>> -mario >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3b8457af-8633-4a8f-9764-0c185e3dd50bn%40googlegroups.com.
