Use is operator without parameter: [is[]] On Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 8:39:01 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:
> Is there a best practice for creating a filter step (or entire filter run) > that doesn't do anything (passes inputs through to outputs)? > > My use case: I'm using the *subfilter* operator where the subfilter is > pulled from a temp tiddler controlled by a checkbox. When the checkbox is > checked, I want to apply an additional filter; when it's unchecked I want > no additional criteria on top of what's already in the filter run before > coming to *subfilter*. I tried just leaving the temp tiddler blank, but > that causes there to be no results since an empty filter always has no > output. > > I got it to work using *search[] *for the no-filter condition, but I'm > not sure if there's a cleaner way to do this. Instinctively it feels like > that could be a bit slow, too, depending on the implementation. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/daf6e641-a4bc-4484-8ab7-ce5664d584a4n%40googlegroups.com.
