D'oh!
Looks like all you may need is a "not" symbol ("!"), like this:
if (!
[ "Yes","yes","Y","y"].contains(store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased")))
continue;
On Feb 19, 3:46 am, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
> the code in question is inside the tiddler contentFooter, as seen in
> the div below the story column (or active tab)
>
> Mike (from my phone)
>
> On Feb 18, 1:36 pm, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > My example can be found here:http://www.strm.us/tw/cigars.html
>
> > Still not having any luck with the one liner . . .
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Mike
>
> > On Feb 14, 4:20 pm, "Mark S." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Mike,
>
> > > "newArray" was supposed to be two terms: new Array
>
> > > The array.contains(...) method isn't part of the original JS spec.s --
> > > its part of the TW library. I've noticed sometimes in this context
> > > that anonymous objects (strings, in particular) revert to the base
> > > code lacking the enhanced TW methods. Forcing the JS to make the
> > > objects seems to be the ticket. Which is probably why your revised
> > > approach, making the array with its own variable, works.
>
> > > Good luck!
> > > Mark
>
> > > On Feb 14, 1:04 pm, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > ReferenceError: newArray is not defined
>
> > > > My Current Code is:
>
> > > > {{center{<script>
> > > > var tids=store.getMatchingTiddlers("Cigar && ! excludeLists && !
> > > > Trash","modified").reverse();
> > > > var rr=tids.length
> > > > //wikify('<br>' + rr + ' raw array items' + '<br>', place); /%check
> > > > Raw Array%/
>
> > > > var fmt='[[%0|%0]]'; /%Needed for clickable results%/
> > > > var filter=[];
> > > > for (var i=0; i<rr; i++) {
> > > > var val1=tids[i].title;
> > > > if (store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"PersonalRank") < 9)
> > > > continue;
> > > > if (store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"PersonalRank") == "Not
> > > > Rated")
> > > > continue;
> > > > // var val=store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased");
> > > > // var choices=["Yes","yes","Y","y"];
> > > > // if (!choices.contains(val)) continue;
> > > > // if
> > > > (["Yes","yes","Y","y"].contains(store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased")))
> > > > continue;
> > > > if
> > > > ((newArray("Yes","yes","Y","y")).contains(store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purch
> > > > ased")))
> > > > continue;
> > > > filter.push(fmt.format([val1]));
> > > > }
> > > > filter.join('\n');
> > > > var ra=filter.length;
> > > > //wikify(ra + ' filtered array items' + '<br>', place); /%check
> > > > filtered array%/
>
> > > > var out=[];
> > > > if (!filter.length) out=["No Cigars found"];
> > > > var ry=Math.floor(Math.random()*filter.length);
> > > > wikify(filter[ry] + ' {{small{(random cigar rated 9 or above) ' +ry
> > > > +'/'+ra+'}}}', place); /%Final Results%/
> > > > </
> > > > script><script>setTimeout("config.refreshers.content(document.getElementByI
> > > > d('fD'))",
> > > > 60000);</script>}}}
>
> > > > Will upload the TW when I get home (Wednesday)
>
> > > > Thanks !
>
> > > > Mike
>
> > > > P.S. The (3) Liner works fine . . .
> > > > // var val=store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased");
> > > > // var choices=["Yes","yes","Y","y"];
> > > > // if (!choices.contains(val)) continue
>
> > > > On Feb 14, 12:59 pm, "Mark S." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > It might be that this ...
>
> > > > > if
> > > > > (["Yes","yes","Y","y"].contains(store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased")))
> > > > > continue;
>
> > > > > needs to be this ...
>
> > > > > if
> > > > > ((new
> > > > > Array("Yes","yes","Y","y")).contains(store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased"
> > > > > )))
> > > > > continue;
>
> > > > > If you have your code with a sub-set of sample data somewhere like
> > > > > tiddlyspot, then perhaps one or more of us could look it over.
>
> > > > > Mark
>
> > > > > On Feb 13, 3:16 pm, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Thank You !
>
> > > > > > 1st option works perfect, 2nd option (one liner) returns
> > > > > > undefined. . .
>
> > > > > > Any benefits of return vs wikify? (Other than they are both better
> > > > > > than document.write)
>
> > > > > > I appreciate your input,
>
> > > > > > Mike
>
> > > > > > On Feb 13, 2:39 pm, Eric Shulman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Is their a way to put multiple conditions on one line I.E.
> > > > > > > > if (store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased") !=
> > > > > > > > "Yes,
> > > > > > > > yes, Y, y") continue;
>
> > > > > > > var val=store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased");
> > > > > > > var choices=["Yes","yes","Y","y"];
> > > > > > > if (!choices.contains(val)) continue;
>
> > > > > > > or.. .written as one line, without temp variables:
>
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > (["Yes","yes","Y","y"].contains(store.getTiddlerSlice(val1,"Purchased")))
> > > > > > > continue;
>
> > > > > > > enjoy,
> > > > > > > -e
> > > > > > > Eric Shulman
> > > > > > > TiddlyTools / ELS Design Studios
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
