@Mohammad
It is not the IF-THEN structure you're asking for but if the input and
output are predefined like that, then it'd be simpler to use a data tiddler
to just get the value i.e {{datatiddler##two}} ---> 2
<:-)
On Sunday, January 24, 2021 at 11:24:58 AM UTC+1 Mohammad wrote:
> I tried to implement the below pseudo code in TW 5.1.23
>
> if x=one then
> print(1)
> elseif x=two then
> print(2)
> elseif x=three then
> print(3)
> else
> print(x is not valid)
> end
>
> with
>
> \define myfun(x)
> <$vars u={{{[<__x__>match[one]then[1]] [<__x__>match[two]then[2]]
> [<__x__>match[three]then[3]] +[addsuffix[ lili]] ~[<__x__>addsuffix[ is
> not valid]]}}} >
> This is u: <<u>>
> </$vars>
> \end
>
> It works fine on https://tiddlywiki.com/ by calling macro as below
>
> <<myfun one>>
> <<myfun two>>
> <<myfun three>>
> <<myfun four>>
>
> I wish to know is this a good practice in TW 5.1.23? If not what better
> solution do you propose?
>
>
> Best wishes
> Mohammad
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ff7f5cc9-a710-4894-949a-b5e83b2788ecn%40googlegroups.com.
