Hi, I'll have to look at your set up.
Several times I have debugged systems using transclusion, and have discovered that transcluded code regularly gets reprocessed 2 or 4 times (never 3). Nothing I did could prevent the multiple processing. So using transcluded code may actually be adding to the processing time. Mark On Feb 27, 6:06 am, wolfgang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On 27 Feb., 07:38, "Mark S." <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to be plugins, rather > than actual file size, that hit performance hardest. > > A half year ago I created for this reason an experimental TW, which > explores pretty much every possible way of creating menus: > > http://menuflex.tiddlyspot.com/ > > Though it does contain most menu building plugins for comparison > reasons too. For not being depended to InlineJavascriptPlugin I tried > to use as much tiddler transclusions as possible. And I would prefer > tabs instead of sliders, since tabs renders the content of only one - > instead of automatic rendering of all sliders upon opening the TW. > > Maybe you're interested? > > Regards. > > PS: this was an ongoing experimentation, therefore the documentation > isn't that up to: Most plugin dependent menus only become visible in > an extra menu by clicking the dot beside 'extra' of the Topmenu. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
