On Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 11:24:59 AM UTC+1 Sapphireslinger wrote: > For a tiddlywiki blog where media will be stored in separate folder, which > is better, speedier, etc? > > 1. [img[path/to/file]] >
If you don't want to tag the image or add any other "meta info" in fields. That's the way to go. > 2. Manually creating a _canonical_uri field with path/to/file, and > switching the tiddler type to jpeg. > The opposite of 1. If you need meta-info go with a tiddler and the _cannonical_uri field. > Another Question: > Do most tiddlywiki bloggers keep their images in another folder or do they > embed them in the wiki, and does this cause bloat and slow loading for blog > vistors? > Go with separated images. If you embed them, you are risking bloat. Slow loading time and slower interaction on the client. ... But it depends a little bit. If you want the wiki to be a "single file wiki" you have to embed them. ... You can do so if you use small images. May be several 100 kByte per image. If you use several MByte per image you'll have problems. I'm using https://squoosh.app/ to check my images against size and quality. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f3dd3ae0-a4d4-4dfc-b4de-1585d6e38f7bn%40googlegroups.com.
