There was a thread about this on GitHub a while back: https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/pull/4766
The consensus that making transclusions discoverable was a good idea but needs to be split into two parts so you can distinguish links and transclusions. On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:29:25 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > G'day all, > > The "Can we customize internal links? > <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/3jjkQ0v7EK0>" got me thinking > ... > > Would it be useful for "backlinks" (the operator and the InfoPanel tab) to > consider not only links but also consider transclusions as links? > > I can't help but think it would be helpful to use transclusions with > templates to create very customized links. > > For highly customizable links: Instead of a link like [[some_tiddler]], > one could instead have {{ some_tiddler || some_link_styling_template }} > > I suppose I don't see a distinction between a link to a tiddler and a > transclusion of a tiddler in the sense that I consider one being a backlink > just as much as the other. > > Any thoughts? Would this be worth putting in as a formal request? > > Of course, even if something could be done, I always like to pause for a > second and wonder: should it? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/55cfe114-42cf-4882-994a-72618521ab66n%40googlegroups.com.
